Characterization of population structure and genetic diversity of Adani goats

Document Type : Research Article (Regular Paper)

Authors

1 Animal Science Research Institute of Iran, Agricultural Research, Education and Extension Organization (AREEO), Karaj, Iran.

2 Animal Science Research Department, Bushehr Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Education Center, AREEO, Bushehr, Iran.

3 Organization of Agriculture -Jahad of Bushehr Province, Bushehr, Iran.

4 Animal Breeding Section, ICAR-National Dairy Research Institute, Eastern Regional Station, Kalyani, West Ben-gal, India.

5 Animal Science Research Department, Kermanshah Agricultural and Natural Resources Research and Educa-tion Center, AREEO, Kermanshah, Iran.

6 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Ilam University, Ilam, Iran.

Abstract

Characterization of population structure and genetic diversity of Adani goats of Iran was assessed through pedigree analysis by using the pedigree data on 2535 kids (offspring of 748 does and 106 bucks), collected for a period of 12 years (2003 through 2014). The kids born during 2011 to 2014 were considered as the reference population. A small proportion of kids (4.10%) were inbred with mean inbreeding coefficients of 0.31 and 7.68 % for the whole and inbred populations, respectively. The mean of generation interval, computed from four gametic pathways including sire-son, sire-daughter, dam-son and dam-daughter, was 2.87 years, with a longer interval from dam-progeny pathway relative to the sire-progeny ones. The effective population size estimated from the individual rate in inbreeding was 45.6. Probability of gene origin measures including the effective numbers of founders (fe), ancestors (fa), founder genomes (fg) and non-founder genomes (fng) were 26, 25, 18 and 70, respectively. Approximately, 50% and 75 % of the total genetic variations were explained by the first 11 and 37 influential ancestors, with a maximum individual contribution of 11.8%. The ratio of fe to fa, as a measure of bottleneck, was 1.04. The average values for genetic conservation index (GCI) in whole, male and female individuals were 2.57, 2.85 and 2.36, respectively. The results revealed that although 3% of the total heterozygosity had been lost from the population, a considerable genetic variability still existed in the population of Adani goats.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  • Alderson, G.L.H., 1992. A system to maximize the maintenance of genetic variability in small populations. In: Alderson, L.J., Bodo, I., (Eds.), Genetic Conservation of Domestic Livestock. CAB International, Wallingford, UK, pp. 18-29.
  • Baldursdottir, B.K., Kristjansson, T., Hallsson, J.H., 2012. Diversity of the Icelandic goat breed assessed using population data. Journal Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica, Section A- Animal science 62, 53-65.
  • Berg, P., Sorensen, M.K., Nielsen, J., 2007. EVA Interface User Manual. P. 40. http://eva.agrsci.dk/index.html
  • Bijlsma, R., Loeschcke, V., 2012. Genetic erosion impedes adaptive responses to stressful environments. Evolutionary Applications 5, 117-129.
  • Boichard, D., Maignel, L., Verrier, E., 1997. The value of using probabilities of gene origin to measure genetic variability in a population. Genetics Selection Evolution 29, 5-23.
  • Caballero, A., Toro, M.A., 2000. Interrelations between effective population size and other pedigree tools for the management of conserved populations. Genetics Research 75, 331-343.
  • Danchin-Burge, C., Allain, D., Clément, V., Piacère, A., Martin, P., Palhière, I., 2012. Genetic variability and French breeding programs of three goat breeds under selection. Small Ruminant Research 108, 36-44.
  • Falconer, D.S., Mackay, T.F.C., 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th Ed. Longman, Harlow, UK.
  • Frankham, R., Ballou, J.D., Briscoe, D.A., 2002. Introduction to Conservation Genetics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
  • Ghafouri-Kesbi, F., 2010. Change in genetic size of small-closed populations: Lessons from a domestic mammal population. Genetics and Molecular Biology 33, 657-662.
  • Goddard, M., 2009. Fitness traits in animal breeding programs. In: van der Werf, J.H.J., Graser, H-U., Frankham, R., Gondro, C. (Eds.), Adaptation and Fitness in Farm Animal Populations. Springer Science & Business Media, Dordrect, The Netherlands, pp. 41-52.
  • Gutierrez, J.P., Altarriba J., Dıaz C., Quintanilla R., Canon J. and Piedrafita, J., 2003. Pedigree analysis of eight Spanish beef cattle breeds. Genetics Selection Evolution 35, 43-64.
  • Gutierrez, J.P., Cervantes, I., Goyache, F., 2009. Improving the estimation of realized effective population sizes in farm animals. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 126, 327-332.
  • Gutierrez, J.P., Cervantes, I., Molina, A., Valera, M., Goyache, F., 2008. Individual increase in inbreeding allows estimating realized effective sizes from pedigrees. Genetics Selection Evolution 40, 359-378.
  • Gutierrez, J.P., Goyache. F., 2005. A note on ENDOG: a computer program for analyzing pedigree information. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics 122, 357-360.
  • Joezy-Shekalgorabi, S., Maghsoudi, A., Taheri-Yeganeh, A., Rajabi-Marand, B., 2016. Pedigree analysis of Cashmere goat breed of South Khorasan. Italian Journal of Animal Science 15, 590-594.
  • Joezy-Shekalgorabi, S., Maghsoudi, A., Taheri-Yeganeh, A., Rajabi-Marand, B., 2017. Genetic variability of Iranian Adani goat breed using pedigree analysis. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences 27, 1774-1780
  • Kosgey, I.S., Okeyo, A.M., 2007. Genetic improvement of small ruminants in low-input, smallholder production systems: technical and infrastructural issues. Small Ruminant Research 70, 76-88.
  • Lacy, R.C., 1989. Analysis of founder representation in pedigrees: Founder equivalents and founder genome equivalents. Zoo Biology 8, 111-123.
  • León, J.M., Lozano, J.M., Martínez, E., Martínez, A., Cabello, A., Camacho, M.E., Delgado, J.V., Quiroz, J., 2005. Anólisis demogrófico de la cabra Granadina como base para el desarrollo de su esquema de selecciín. Archivos de Zootecnia 54, 311–315.
  • Leroy, G., Mary-Huard, T., Verrier, E., Danvy, S., Charvolin, E., Danchin-Burge, C., 2013. Methods to estimate effective population size using pedigree data: Examples in dog, sheep, cattle and horse. Genetics Selection Evolution 45, 1.
  • Lima, P.J.S., Souza, D.L., Pereira, G.F., Torreão, J.N.C., Moura, J.F.P., Gomes, J.T., Lopez Acosta, J.M., Rey Sanz, S., Ribeiro, M.N., Pimenta Filho, E.C., 2007. Gestão genética de rac¸ as caprinas nativas no estado da paraíba. Archivos de Zootecnia 56, 623–626.
  • MacCluer, J.W., Boyce, A.J., Dyke, B., Weitkamp, L.R., Pfennig, D.W., Parsons, C.J., 1983. Inbreeding and pedigree structure in Standardbred horses. Journal of Heredity 74, 394-399.
  • Maignel, L., Boichard, D., Verrier, E., 1996. Genetic variability of French dairy breeds estimated from pedigree information. Interbull Bulletin 14, 49–54.
  • Menezes, L.M., Sousa, W.H., CavalcantiFilho, E.P., Cartaxo, F.Q., Viana, J.A., Gama, L.T., 2015. Genetic variability in a nucleus herd of Boer goats in Brazil assessed by pedigree analysis. Small Ruminant Research 131, 85-92.
  • Meuwissen, T.H.E., Luo, Z., 1992. Computing inbreeding coefficients in large populations. Genetics Selection Evolution 24, 305-313.
  • Mokhtari, M.S., Moghbeli, M. and Gutiérrez, J.P., 2017. Genetic variability and population structure of Raeini Cashmere goats determined by pedigree analysis. Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies 5, 43-50.
  • Oliveira, R.R., Brasil, L.H.A., Delgado, J,V., Peguezuelos, J., León, J.M., Guedes, D.G.P., Arandas, J.K.G., Ribeiro, M.N., 2016. Genetic diversity and population structure of the Spanish Murciano-Granadina goat breed according to pedigree data. Small Ruminant Research 144, 170-175.
  • Oravcová, M., 2013. Pedigree analysis in White Shorthaired goat: first results. Archive Tierzucht 56, 547-554.
  • Portolano, B., Finocchiaro, R., Todaro, M., Van Kaam, J.T., Giaccone, P., 2004. Demographic characterization and genetic variability of the Girgentana goat breed by the analysis of genealogical data. Italian Journal of Animal Science 3, 41-45.
  • Rashidi, A., Mokhtari, M.S., Gutiérrez, J.P., 2015. Pedigree analysis and inbreeding effects on early growth traits and greasy fleece weight in Markhoz goat. Small Ruminant Research 124, 1-8.
  • Sadeghi, S.A.T., Rokouei, M., VafayeValleh, M., Abbasi, M.A., Faraji-Arough, H., 2020. Estimation of additive and non-additive genetic variance component for growth traits in Adani goats. Tropical Animal Health and Production 52, 733-742.
  • van Wyk, J.B., Fair, M.D., Cloete, S.W.P., 2009. Case study: The effect of inbreeding on the production and reproduction traits in the Elsenburg Dormer sheep stud. Livestock Science 120, 218-224.
  • Vozzi, P.A., Marcondes, C.R., Bezerra, L.A.F., Lobo, R.B. 2007. Pedigree Analyses in the Breeding Program for Nellore Cattle, Genetics and Molecular Research 29, 482-485.
  • Yazdanshenas, M.S., VaezTorshizi, R., EmamJomeKashan, N., Aminafshar, M., 2013. Estimation of genetic parameters for direct and maternal effects of growth traits in Iranian Adani goats. Annals of Biological Research 4, 20-26.
Journal of Livestock Science and Technologies
Volume 8, Issue 1
June 2020
Pages 79-89

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics