Digestibility, microbial protein synthesis, rumen and blood parameters in sheep fed diets containing hydroponic barley fodder

Document Type : Original Research Article (Regular Paper)

Authors

1 Department of Animal Science, Faculty of Agriculture, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

2 Research and Technology Institute of Plant Production, Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, Kerman, Iran.

Abstract

This experiment was conducted to determine the possibility of replacing part of the barley grain by hydroponic barley fodder (HBF), and evaluating its effect on digestibility, rumen parameters, microbial protein synthesis and blood parameters in sheep. Four male Kermani sheep, 18-month-old (34.7 ± 1 kg live weight) were randomly assigned to a change over 4 × 4 design and fed the experimental diets for 21 d; 16 d for adaptation and 5 d for sample collection. Hydroponic-grown barley fodder replaced barley grain in the experimental diets. The experimental diets were: 1) control diet (without hydroponic barley fodder), 2) diet containing 7% of hydroponic barley fodder, 3) diet containing 14% of hydroponic barley fodder and 4) diet containing 21% of hydroponic barley fodder. Results showed that dry matter intake (DMI), nitrogen intake and retention and digestibility of nutrients increased (P<0.05) by increasing the amount of hydroponic barley fodder in experimental diets. Ammonia-nitrogen production changed cubically with increasing level of HBF in the experimental diets (P<0.05). In conclusion, the increase in DMI, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention suggests that up to 21% of HBF may be fed to sheep. However, an economic analysis is needed before recommendation for practical use at the farm level.

Keywords


Introduction

Growing plants in water or in nutrient solutions without using soil is known as hydroponic fodder or sprouted grains or sprouted fodder (Dung et al, 2010). Hydroponic production systems have been used to produce vegetables for human consumption as well as cereal and legume sprouts for both livestock and human feed. Germination of grain increases the availability and digestibility of nutrients. Reports indicated that sprouts provide a source of rapidly available nutrients due to the action of hydrolytic enzymes releasing readily available amino acids and soluble carbohydrates (Plaza et al., 2003). Soaking and germination cause increased activities of hydrolytic enzymes, improvements in the contents of total proteins, fat, certain essential amino acids, total sugars, B-group vitamins, and a decrease in dry matter, starch and anti-nutrients in sprouting grains (Salunkhe et al., 1984; Peer and Leeson, 1985b; Chavan and Kadam, 1989; Gabrovska et al., 2004).

Dung et al. (2010) reported that no advantage was found when beef animals were given sprouts to replace highly nutritious feeds; however, animals rapidly consumed 6-7 folds green forages possibly due to improved microbial activities. As a result, there was an improvement in efficiency if the forage was added as supplements to diets containing protein deficient hay (Thomas and Reddy, 1962; Tudor et al., 2003). The biological and economic aspects of hydroponic forage culture will depend on sprouting systems, type and quality of the grain, particularly the germination rate, culturing conditions and the management that require further investigation (Fazaeli et al., 2011). Research on availability of hydroponic grown forage as livestock feed, especially in sheep, is very limited needing more research to help determine their optimal levels in livestock diets. Forage limitation and drought are common problems in many parts of Iran. Therefore, nutrient profile, digestibility and conversion ratio of barley fodder production were examined in a hydroponic system. Additionally, feeding value of hydroponic barley and its suitability to replace part of the barley grain in the diet of sheep were investigated.

Materials and methods

Hydroponic barley fodder production

Seeds of barley were washed and soaked in tap water for 18 hours and steeped in water containing 0.5% (v/v) sodium hypochlorite solution for 30 min, and washed before being transferred to perforated plastic trays (50 × 30 × 1 cm) for watering. The seeds were allowed to germinate in a temperature-controlled room (25 ͦC) at 1.5 × 2 m dimensions with continuous lighting for 7 d. They were automatically watered with tap water for 1 min at of 4 h intervals for a period of 7 d. The fresh sprouts were then removed from the trays and allowed to drain the surface water for at least 30 min for to be removed. Dry matter content, crude protein, ether extract, ash in barley grains and the hydroponic fodder were analyzed according to AOAC (2005). Neutral detergent and acid detergent fiber (NDF and ADF) were determined as described by Van Soest et al. (1991).

Experimental diets and animal

The experimental diets were: 1) control diet (barley grain (BG) without hydroponic barley fodder (HBF)), 2) diet containing 7% of BG replaced by HBF, 3) diet containing 14% of BG replaced by HBF and 4) diet containing 21% of BG replaced by HBF (Table 1). All experimental diets contained 40% forage and 60% concentrate. Four rams (34.7 ± 1 kg live weight) were used in 4 × 4 Latin Square design at four 21-days period; 16 days for adaptation to diets and 5 days for sample collection in each period. Sheep were housed separately in metabolic cages for fecal and urinary collection. Diets were offered as total mixed ration (TMR) at 8:30 am and 17:30 pm. Water was freely available.

Table 1. Feed ingredients and chemical composition of the experimental diets

Ingredient (% DM)

Experimental diets

1

2

3

4

Alfalfa hay

25

25

25

25

Wheat straw

15

15

15

15

Hydroponic barley fodder

0

7

14

21

Ground barley

30

23

16

9

Ground corn

15

14.5

14

16

Soybean meal

4

3

3

2.5

Wheat bran

9

10.5

11

9.5

Vitamin & mineral supplement*

1.5

1.5

1.5

1.5

Salt

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

Chemical composition

 

 

 

 

DM (%)

76.94

71.53

66.04

66.60

OM (%)

94

93.13

93.17

92.45

ME (Mcal/kg)

2.40

2.39

2.37

2.37

CP (%)

12.22

12.09

12.34

12.19

RDP (%)

8.60

8.60

8.79

8.65

RUP (%)

3.66

3.49

3.55

3.54

EE (%)

2.28

2.37

2.42

2.49

NDF (%)

37.50

39.82

41.77

42.85

ADF (%)

22.59

33.11

23.59

23.79

DM: dry matter, OM: organic matter, ME: metabolizable energy CP: crude protein, RDP: rumen degradable protein, RUP: rumen undegradable protein, EE: ether extract, ADF: acid detergent fiber, NDF: neutral detergent fiber. *Mineral and vitamin supplement contained: Vit A (500000 IU), Vit D3 (100000 IU), Vit E (100 IU) and minerals (mg): Fe (3000), Cu (300), Mn (300), Ca (2000), Zn (3000), P (90000), Co (100), Na (50000), I (100), Mg (19000) and Se (1).

 

Blood, fecal, urinary and ruminal fluid sampling

On the last day of each experimental period, blood was collected four hours after morning feeding from the jugular vein in 10 mL syringes and immediately transferred into 10-mL sodium heparinized, evacuated glass tubes and placed on crushed ice. Blood was centrifuged at 3,000 g for 10 min at 4°C, and plasma was harvested and frozen at −20 °C for later analysis. Glucose, total protein, triglycerides, cholesterol and blood urea nitrogen (BUN), were measured using enzymatic procedures and commercial kits according to the manufacturer's instructions (Pars Azmon Co., Tehran, Iran).

 Total feces were collected in plastic bags every five days during the experimental period. After collection, the feces were weighed and dried in an oven at 55 ͦC for 72 h, for dry matter (DM), organic matter (OM), crude protein (CP) and NDF analysis (de Oliveira et al., 2010).

Daily urine production was collected for 5 d and a 100 mL sample was mixed with 10% (V/V) H2SO4 to prevent bacterial degradation of allantoin and volatile N losses. Due to the variability in the urine volume produced by rams, the volume of H2SO4 was adjusted to ensure that the pH was maintained below 3.0 (Chen and Gomes, 1992). For determination of the urinary purine derivatives, uric acid, urea nitrogen and creatinine excretion, a 50 mL sub-sample of the diluted urine was stored in a plastic bottle at -20 ͦC.

The quantity of microbial purine absorbed through the small intestine was estimated using the following equation (Chen and Gomez, 1992):

Y = 0.84X + (0.150 BW0.75e-0.25x)     (1)             

where, X is the intestinally-absorbed purine derivatives (PD, exogenous purine), and Y is the excretion of PD in the urine (mmol/d).

At the completion of each period, ruminal fluid samples were aspirated by stomach tube at 0, 2, 4 and 6 h after feeding from all animals. Ruminal pH was determined immediately after ruminal fluid was filtered through four layers of cheesecloth using a pH meter (model AZ8601). A 10-mL was mixed with 0.2 mL of sulfuric acid 50% (Merck) for NH3-N analysis, and chilled in an ice bath to stop fermentation. The samples were stored at -20 ͦC until assay.

Statistical analyses

Data on chemical composition were subjected to analysis of variance using the GLM procedure of SAS (2005) as a completely randomized design as Yij= μ + Ti + eij in which, Yij is the individual observation, μ the general mean, Ti the ith effect of the treatments (HBF and BG) and eij is  the standard error. Mean separation was performed using the least significant difference (P

 

Yijk = μ + Ti + Pj + Ck + eijk        (2)

Repeated measure data (ruminal pH and ammonia-N) were analyzed using the following model:

Yijk = μ + Ti + Pj + Ck + Zm + ZTmi + eijk     (3)

Where Yijk is the dependent variable, μ is the common mean, Ti is the experimental treatment effect, Pj is experimental period effect, Ck is animal effect, Zm is time effect, ZTmi is interaction of treatment and time and eijk is the random error. Polynomial contrasts were used to determine linear, quadratic and cubic components of the dietary treatment response.

Results

Chemical composition

Chemical composition of barley grain and HBF are shown in Table 2. Barley grain contained higher (P

Table 2. Chemical analysis of barley grain and hydroponic barley fodder

Constituents

Barley

Hydroponic barley fodder

SEM*

DM (%)

91.00a

16.00b

1.00

OM (%)

96.80a

95.25b

0.23

CP (%)

12.20b

14.16a

0.25

EE (%)

1.64b

2.42a

0.10

NDF (%)

22.50b

43.68a

2.60

ADF (%)

11.40b

17.35a

0.38

ASH (%)

3.20b

4.75a

0.23

DM: dry matter, OM: organic matter, CP: crude protein, EE: ether extract, NDF: neutral detergent fiber, ADF: acid detergent fiber exclusive of residual ash.

Means within the same row with differing superscripts are significantly different at P

*SEM: standard error of the mean.

 

 

Dry matter intake and nutrient digestibility

The effects of dietary HBF on dry matter intake (DMI) and digestibility of DM, OM, CP, and NDF are summarized in Table 3. Digestibility of DM increased linearly and quadratically (P

Table 3. Dry matter intake and nutrient digestibility in sheep fed different levels of hydroponic barley fodder

 

Experimental diets

SEM*

Orthogonal contrasts

 

1

2

3

4

linear

quadratic

cubic

DMI (kg/d)

1.23d

1.50c

1.76b

1.98a

0.05

0.0001

0.60

0.89

DM digestibility (%)

59.69c

67.26b

71.83a

73.81a

0.87

0.0001

0.02

0.92

OM digestibility (%)

62.25c

69.10b

73.51a

74.90a

0.81

0.0001

0.01

0.88

CP digestibility (%)

59.41c

68.50b

73.01a

75.32a

0.82

0.0001

0.01

0.54

NDF digestibility (%)

26.07c

43.03b

53.29a

57.31a

1.51

0.0001

0.01

0.95

DMI: dry matter intake, OM: organic matter, CP: crude protein, NDF: neutral detergent fiber, ADF: acid detergent fiber,

Experimental diets including: 1) control diet (without hydroponic barley fodder), 2) diet containing 7% of hydroponic barley fodder, 3) diet containing 14% of hydroponic barley fodder and 4) diet containing 21% of hydroponic barley fodder.

Means within the same row with differing superscripts are significantly different at P

*SEM: standard error of the mean.

 

 

Rumen parameters

Concentrations of NH3-N and pH in the ruminal fluid are shown in Table 4. Ruminal pH values were not affected by HBF feeding. Ammonia-N production changed cubically by increasing the dietary HBF (P3-N were recorded for experimental diets containing 7 and 21% HBF  and the lowest values were for control and diet containing 14% HBF, numerically (P>0.05).

Table 4. Concentrations of NH3-N and pH in rumen of sheep fed different levels of hydroponic barley fodder.

 

Experimental diets

SEM*

Orthogonal contrasts

1

2

3

4

linear

Quadratic

cubic

Total NH3-N (mg/dl rumen liquid)

31.81

36.98

30.93

34.20

3.23

0.10

0.83

0.07

pH

6.70

6.69

6.69

6.75

0.06

0.72

0.22

0.88

Experimental diets including: 1) control diet (without hydroponic barley fodder), 2) diet containing 7% of hydroponic barley fodder, 3) diet containing 14% of hydroponic barley fodder and 4) diet containing 21% of hydroponic barley fodder.

*SEM: standard error of the mean.

 

 

Blood parameters

Blood glucose, crude fat, BUN and total blood plasma protein concentrations were not affected by the diets (Table 5). Blood triglyceride levels were reduced from 14 to 21%, with increasing amount of HBF in the diet, cholesterol concentration increased numerically (P>0.05).

Table 5. Blood parameters of sheep fed different levels of hydroponic barley fodder.

Parameters

Experimental diets

SEM*

Orthogonal contrasts

1

2

3

4

linear

quadratic

cubic

Glucose (mg/dl)

69.25

71.50

61.25

70.00

5.13

0.74

0.55

0.22

Total protein (mg/dl)

7.20

8.75

8.68

7.77

0.82

0.67

0.19

0.83

Cholesterol (mg/dl)

56.25

56.25

53.25

58.75

1.79

0.59

0.17

0.20

Triglyceride (mg/dl)

26.25

28.75

28.75

21.25

2.75

0.24

0.15

0.88

Urea N (mg/dl)

17.36

17.22

17.94

17.83

0.77

0.51

1.00

0.66

Experimental diets including: 1) control diet (without hydroponic barley fodder), 2) diet containing 7% of hydroponic barley fodder, 3) diet containing 14% of hydroponic barley fodder and 4) diet containing 21% of hydroponic barley fodder.

*SEM: standard error of the mean.

 

 

Purine derivatives, microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention

Mean values for daily excretion of PD containing allantoin, uric acid, creatinine, total PD in the urine, microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention are shown in Table 6. Feeding HBF had no significant effect on urinary purine derivatives and microbial protein synthesis in male sheep. Nevertheless, numerically experimental diets containing 7 and 21% HBF produced the highest content of microbial protein synthesis in the rumen, whereas higher values for uric acid and creatinine excretion in urine were detected in diet containing 14% HBF.

Table 6. Daily excretion of total purine derivatives, allantoin, uric acid, Creatinine, microbial protein synthesis Nitrogen intake, fecal and urine N output and nitrogen retention in sheep fed different levels of hydroponic barley fodder

 

Experimental diets

SEM*

Orthogonal contrasts

 

1

2

3

4

linear

quadratic

Cubic

Urine allantoin output (mmol/d)

9.18

10.45

10.20

9.70

1.15

0.82

0.46

0.82

Uric acid (mmol/d)

0.20

0.18

0.21

0.15

0.03

0.42

0.54

0.35

Creatinine (mmol/d)

3.62

4.69

5.02

4.58

0.58

0.27

0.24

0.99

Total purine derivatives (mmol/d)

10.92

12.35

12.07

11.47

1.29

0.82

0.46

0.81

Microbial nitrogen (g/d)

9.32

10.62

10.38

9.85

1.16

0.80

0.46

0.81

Microbial protein (g/d)

58.22

66.41

64.85

61.55

7.25

0.80

0.46

0.81

N intake (g/d)

24.07d

29.05c

34.77b

38.54 a

0.99

0.0001

0.56

0.56

Fecal N output (g/d)

9.76

9.16

9.41

9.44

0.36

0.68

0.42

0.54

Urine N output (g/d)

0.36

0.38

0.34

0.35

0.03

0.62

0.86

0.53

Total N excretion (g/d)

10.12

9.54

9.75

9.79

0.36

0.65

0.43

0.58

Nitrogen retention (g/d)

13.95d

19.51c

25.02b

28.75a

0.82

0.0001

0.31

0.65

Experimental diets including: 1) control diet (without hydroponic barley fodder), 2) diet containing 7% of hydroponic barley fodder, 3) diet containing 14% of hydroponic barley fodder and 4) diet containing 21% of hydroponic barley fodder.

Means within the same row with differing superscripts are significantly different at P

*SEM: standard error of the means.

 

 

As can be seen in Table 6, N intake increased linearly (P

Discussion

Chemical composition

There was a significant difference between chemical composition of barley grain and HBF. Dry matter losses of 17.8 % and 18% were reported in 6 d sprouting oat seeds and 7 d sprouting barley seeds (Hillier and Perry, 1969; Peer and Leeson, 1985b). Fazaeli et al. (2012) also reported similar results in 7-day old hydroponically sprouted barley grains grown under light, without nutrients. Leaching of material from the seed following soaking as well as degradation and oxidation of substrates from the seed during the sprouting process was reported as a cause of the loss in DM from the original weight of seed (Peer and Leeson, 1985a; Chavan and Kadam, 1989). Chung et al. (1989) found an increase in fiber content from 3.75% in unsprouted barley seeds to 6% in 5-day sprouted barley. An increase in NDF and ADF caused by the sugars is used for cell wall synthesis providing energy for growth (Cuddeford, 1989). This was likely due to the loss in carbohydrates as DM providing energy for the metabolic activities and growth resulting in lower OM and higher ash in HBF (Chavan and Kadam, 1989). Similar findings were reported by Peer and Leeson (1985a) and Fazaeli et al. (2012). Morgan et al. (1992) reported that the ash content of hydroponic fodder increased from day 4 corresponding with the extension of the root, which allows mineral uptake. There are contradictory results on changes in lipid (EE) contents as a result of germination. For example, Kylen and McCready (1975) and Camacho et al. (1992) reported decreases in lipid content of barley sprout with germination while increases were noted by Peer and Leeson (1985b) and Fazaeli et al. (2012). The increase in EE could be due to production of chlorophyll associated with plant growth (Mayer et al., 1975 as cited in Fazaeli et al., 2012).

In cereal grains, Chavan and Kadam (1989) reported that sprouting led to an increase in the content of plant constituents which can increase the associated functions. Barley sprouts were originally used as feed for livestock, and research on sprouts constituents as feed has been developed. Sprouted barley has higher inorganic ingredients such as Ca, Fe, and Zn than other cereals. According to Peer and Leeson, (1985a), 70% increase in essential amino acids contents was found from day 4 to day 7 after seed germination.

Dung et al. (2010) found that CP content of barley grains before and after germination were 13.9 and 15.9%, respectively. However, Snow et al. (2008) reported a higher (16.13%) CP content in HBF. Increased amount of protein in hydroponic fodder from day 4 of sprouting reported by Morgan et al. (1992) could be due to absorption of nitrate that facilitates the metabolism of nitrogenous compounds from carbohydrate reserves, and may be responsible for increasing the crude protein content. The use of nutrient solution increases the CP content of the hydroponic fodder compared with tap water presumably due to the uptake of nitrogenous compounds contained in hydroponic solutions (Dung et al., 2010).

Cultivation conditions in a hydroponic system could have caused differences in CP contents (Fazaeli, 2012). Most of these increases in nutrients are not true increases, but simply a reflection of the loss in total DM through respiration during germination, mainly in the form of carbohydrates. Therefore, by increasing the duration of sprouting, greater losses in DM and increase in protein content will occur. It has been found that as total carbohydrates decrease, the percentages of other nutrients increase (Lorenz, 1980; Peer and Leeson, 1985b; Chavan and Kadam, 1989; Morgan et al., 1992). The exception is fiber, a major constituent of cell walls, which increases both in percentage and real values with the synthesis of structural carbohydrates, such as cellulose and hemicelluloses (Cuddeford, 1989 as cited in Sneath and McIntosh, 2003).

Dry matter intake and nutrient digestibility

Similar to our results, Dung et al. (2010) and Fayed (2011) also reported increased in DMI with hydroponic barley fodder. It is possible that the release of soluble carbohydrates and N from HBF stimulated microbial growth and colonization, and improved degradation of the low protein forage used in their experiments (Pond et al., 1984).

Unlike the results of the present study, Peer and Leeson (1985a) found in pigs that digestibility of DM of 4-day old HBF was significantly lower in sprouted barley than ground barley, but was superior to that recorded for whole barley. There was no discernable effect on DM, CP and crude fiber digestibility when cattle were fed four levels of hydroponic oat sprouts (0, 0.63, 0.95, 1.26 kg DM) in both low and high-energy diets (Hillier and Perry, 1969). Also, Dung et al. (2010) demonstrated that DM and OM digestibility was not affected by feeding HBF to sheep. A research conducted at Washington State University concluded that digestibility of the sprouted wheat was slightly lower compared with sound wheat (Lardy, 1999). Results obtained in our study were comparable with those reported by Morgan et al. (1992) who found an increase in DM and OM digestibility of 4-day-old sprouts in comparison to barley grains and 8-day-old sprouts. Our findings are in agreement with those of Fayed (2011) where female Barki lambs were fed on diets containing 10-day-old sprouted barley grains on rice straw or sprouted barley grains on dried Tamarix. Ibrahim et al. (2001) also reported the digestibility coefficient of all nutrients increased in sheep as a result of feeding sprouted barley on rice straw.

The germination of seeds to sprouts increases the hydrolysis of nutrient reserves stored in the seed allowing for the release of soluble compounds (Plaza et al., 2003) and consequently leading to increases in nutrient availability in the rumen. The release of soluble carbohydrates and nitrogen from the sprouts most likely can help the proliferation of micro-organisms for a more efficient degradation of diets containing HBF giving rise to higher digestibility values relative to the treatments without HBF supplementation (Fayed, 2011).

Increased DMI in the present study, may be attributed to palatability and high digestibility of the diets containing HBF, corroborated by Dung et al. (2010) and Fayed (2011) findings. However, Fazaeli et al. (2011) reported that including 8-day-old HBF by 22.8% in the diet reduced DMI in male calves.

Rumen parameters

Dung et al. (2010) reported that the lowest rumen pH value and the highest total volatile fatty acid (TVFA) concentration were obtained in sheep fed on diets containing HBF compared to diets without HBF. They also found that total ammonia concentration was higher for fresh HBF supplements than the diets without HBF. Similar results were obtained by Fayed (2011). However, Hafla et al. (2014) hypothesized that the rate of NH3-N release from herbage NPN was faster than that of water soluble sugars in sprouted barley resulting in NH3-N accumulation. In the present study, all diets had similar levels of CP and RDP, thus the rate of protein degradation and the ammonia production in the rumen of sheep fed with the experimental diets were almost the same.

Blood parameters

Blood parameters were not affect by treatments. The diets were isocaloric and the rumen pH was not significantly affected, therefore, it seems that propionate production in the rumen as a precursor of glucose via gluconeogenesis in the liver was similar in all treatments. The results of this study were in accordance with the results reported by Kumar et al. (1980) who found a positive correlation between dietary protein and plasma protein concentration. However, Fayed (2011) reported that ewes fed sprouted barley on roughages had significantly higher values of serum total proteins.  This may be due to the high CP content in treated roughages. In this experiment, BUN was not different between treatments in the rumen of sheep fed with experimental diets. We can conclude that the process of converting ammonia to urea in the liver of sheep fed with the experimental diets were similar.

Purine derivatives, microbial protein synthesis and nitrogen retention

Ammonia is the main substrate for microbial protein synthesis. Because ammonia production in the rumen was not affected by the experimental diets, and the experimental diets were iso-nitrogenous and iso-energetic, it seems that nitrogen and energy requirements for microbial protein synthesis were provided by all diets. The rumen microbial outflow did not differ among treatments. Efficient microbial protein synthesis depends on supply of adequate N and readily fermentable carbohydrates as well as other nutrients for uptake and utilization by microbes.

Fayed (2011) reported that production of sprouted barley by utilizing dried Tamarix and rice straw was economical and feeding 10-day-old sprouted barley grains increased N intake and retention in female lambs. In this experiment, the higher nitrogen intake was due to the higher DMI for the diet containing 21% HBF. This finding may be related to higher improvement in CP intake and digestibility in experimental diets containing HBF compared with the control diet. However, supplementing poor quality roughage (oat hay) with freshly sprouted barley and freeze-dried sprouted barley did not affect microbial outflow and N retention in sheep (Dung et al., 2010).

Conclusion

Our results showed that including HBF in diet up to 21%, had no effect on microbial protein synthesis, ammonia-N and blood parameters. However, the increase in DMI, nutrient digestibility and nitrogen retention suggests that it may be possible to feed up to 21% of HBF to sheep. However, an economic analysis is needed before recommendation for practical use at the farm level.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the support of Shahid Bahonar University of Kerman, especially the Department of Animal Science. We are grateful to Emeritus Professor Acram Taji from Queensland University of Technology in Australia for critical reading of the manuscript.

 

  • AOAC, 2005. Official Methods of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists. 14th Ed., Washington DC., USA.
  • Camacho, L., Sierra, C., Campos, R., Guzman, E., Marcus, D., 1992. Nutritional changes caused by the germination of legumes commonly eaten in Chile. Archives Latinoam of Nutrition 42, 283-290.
  • Chavan, J.K., Kadam, S.S., 1989. Nutritional improvement of cereals by sprouting. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 28, 401-437.
  • Chen, X.B., Gomez, M.J., 1992. Estimation of microbial protein supply to sheep and cattle based on urinary excretion of purine derivatives. An Overview of the Technical Details, Occasional Publication International Feed Resources Unit, Rowett Research Institute, Bucksburn Aberdeen AB2 9SB, UK.
  • Chung, T.Y., Nwokolo, E.N., Sim, J.S., 1989. Compositional and digestibility changes in sprouted barley and canola seeds. Plant Foods for Human Nutrition 39, 267-278.
  • Cuddeford, D., 1989. Hydroponics grass. In Practice 11, 211-214.
  • De Oliveira, A.S., Campos, J.M.S., Oliveira, M.R.C., Brito, A.F., Valadares Filho, S.C., Detmann, E., Valadares, R.F.D., De Souza, S.M. and Machado, O.L.T., 2010. Nutrient digestibility, nitrogen metabolism and hepatic function of sheep fed diets containing solvent or expeller castor seed meal treated with calcium hydroxide. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 158, 15-28.
  • Dung D.D., Godwin I.R., Nolan, J.V., 2010. Digestive characteristics, ammonia nitrogen and volatile fatty acids levels, in sheep fed oaten chaff supplemented with Grimmett barley grain freeze-dried or fresh barley sprouts. Journal of Animal and Veterinary Advances 9, 2493-2501.
  • Fayed, A.M., 2011. Comparative study and feed evaluation of sprouted barley grains on rice straw versus Tamarix mannifera on performance of growing Barki lambs in Sinai. Journal of American Science 7, 954-961.
  • Fazaeli, H., Golmohammadi, H.A., Shoayee, A.A., Montajebi N., Mosharraf, S.H., 2011. Performance of feedlot calves fed hydroponics fodder barley. Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology 13, 367-375.
  • Fazaeli, H., Golmohammadi, H.A., Tabatabayee, S.N., Asghari-Tabrizi, M., 2012. Productivity and nutritive value of barley green fodder yield in hydroponic system. World Applied Sciences Journal 16, 531-539.
  • Gabrovska, D., Rysova, J., Fiedlerova, V., Holasova, M., Mascova, E., Ouhrabkova, J., Winterova, R., Michalova, A., 2004. Nutritional changes in common oat (Avena sativa L.) and naked oat (Avena nuda L.) during germination. Czech Journal of Food Science 22, 317-320.
  • Hafla, A.N., Soder, K.J., Brito, A.F., Rubano, M.D., Dell, C.J. 2014. Effect of sprouted barley grain supplementation of an herbage-based or haylage-based diet on ruminal fermentation and methane output in continuous culture. Journal of Dairy Science 97, 7856-7869.
  • Hillier, R.J., Perry, T.W., 1969. Effect of hydroponically produced oat grass on ration digestibility of cattle. Journal of Animal Science 29, 783-785.
  • Ibrahim, A., Fathia H., M. El-Hosseiny, El- Sayed, I.M., 2001. Effect of using sprouted barley by recycle process of agriculture residues on feeding value, rumen activity and some blood constituents of crossbred sheep. Egyptian Journal of Nutrition and Feeds 4, 265-273.
  • Kumar, N.U., Singh, S., Verma, D.N., 1980. Effect of different levels of dietary protein and energy on growth of male buffalo calves. Indian Journal of Animal Science 51, 513-518.
  • Kylen, A.M., McCready, R.M., 1975. Nutrients in seeds and sprouts of alfalfa, lentils, mung beans and soybeans. Journal of Food Science 40, 1008-1009.
  • Lardy, G., 1999. Feeding value of sprouted grains. Available at  https://www.ag.ndsu.edu/publications/livestock/feeding-value-of-sprouted-grains. Verified 18 Nov. 2017].  North Dakota State University, NDSU Extension Service.
  • Lorenz, K., 1980. Cereal sprouts: composition, nutritive value, food applications. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 13, 353-385.
  • Mayer, A.M., Poljakoff-Mayber, A., 1975. The Germination of Seeds. 2nd Ed. Pergamon Press, Toronto, Canada.
  • Morgan, J.V., Hunter, R.R., O'Haire, R., 1992. Limiting factors in hydroponic barley grass production. Proceedings of the 8th International Congress on Soilless Culture. Hunter's Rest, South Africa.
  • Peer, D.J., Leeson, S., 1985a. Feeding value of hydroponically produced barley for poultry and pigs. Animal Feed Science and Technology 13, 183-190.
  • Peer, D.J., Leeson, S., 1985b. Nutrient content of hydroponically sprouted barley. Animal Feed Science and Technology 13, 191-202.
  • Plaza, L., De Ancos, B., Cano, M.P., 2003. Nutritional and health-related compounds in sprouts and seeds of soybean (Glycin max), Wheat (Triticum aestivum L) and alfalfa (Medicago sativa) treated by a new drying method. European Food Research Technology 216, 138-144.
  • Salunkhe, D.K., Chavan, J.K., Jadhav, S.J., 1984. Nutritional and Processing Quality of Sorghum. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi, India,
  • SAS, 2005. User’s Guide: Statistics, Version 9.1. SAS Institute Inc. Cary, NC, USA.
  • Sneath, R., McIntosh, F., 2003. Review of hydroponic fodder production for beef cattle. Project Number NBP.332, Queensland Government, Department of Primary Industries, Dalby, Queensland, Australia.
  • Snow, A.M., Ghaly, A.E., Snow, A., 2008. A comparative assessment of hydroponically grown cereal crops for the purification of aquaculture wastewater and the production of fish feed. American Journal of Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3, 364-378.
  • Thomas, J.W, Reddy, B.S., 1962. Sprouted oats as a feed for dairy cows. Quarterly Bulletin of the Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station 44, 654-655.
  • Tudor, G.D., Darcy, T., Smith, P.C., Shallcross, F., Allen, J.G., 2003. Is there a role for hydroponics in the beef industry? Proceeding of the 25th Biennial Australian Society of Animal Production, Wagga Wagga, NSW, Australia. pp 333.
  • Van Soest, P.J., Robertson, J.B., Lewis, B.A., 1991. Methods for dietary fiber, neutral detergent fiber, and non-starch polysaccharides in relation to animal nutrition. Journal of Dairy Science 74, 3583-3583-3597.